Welcome to Today in Books, our daily round-up of literary headlines at the intersection of politics, culture, media, and more. Dictionaries have two reliable ways of making news. The first is announcing which words have been added. The second is announcing their "Word of the Year." Here’s a look at what have been chosen as the words of the year so far. The Cambridge Dictionary
My take: I first heard this word in the context of podcast listening, but Cambridge argues that it is now breaking into celebrity and influencer culture. How different are these "parasocial" relationships than being super into Nirvana in 1991 or being a close watcher of the Royal Family? Mostly is that the objects of these relationships are feeding the social algorithms with a steady stream of erstaz intimacy. Oxford University Press My take : This is nothing new of course, neither online nor in pre-digital life. What does seem to me new is everyone knows what it is, how do it, why it stinks, and yet cannot help themselves. No one is convinced. No one finds it funny. It does one thing: make us hate ourselves and others.
Dictionary.com Searches for 67 experienced a dramatic rise beginning in the summer of 2025. Since June, those searches have increased more than sixfold, and so far the surge shows no signs of stopping. Most other two-digit numbers had no meaningful trend over that period, implying that there is something special about 67." My take: Here it is, the reducto ad absurdum of internet dialect. A phrase that means nothing repeated only for the sake of repeating something everyone knows means nothing. This is the leading candidate for "hey do you remember when we all said that in middle school? We were so dumb, lol." ___________________________________ Merriam-Webster has not yet made their announcement, but I would bet that, like the other selections, it will be a word that oozed out of internet slime. And I think the new word/phrase that emerged this year that both captures and critiques our current enthrallment to online ways of being is this: AI slop. The word, like the thing it describes, has a beautiful terror to it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||